dnm test only!

[simonbaird]

I just want to trigger the test ITS at
https://konflux-ui.apps.stone-prd-rh01.pg1f.p1.openshiftapps.com/ns/rhtap-contract-tenant/applications/ec-main/integrationtests

Ref: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/EC-1716

[qodo-code-review]

ⓘ You are approaching your monthly quota for Qodo. Upgrade your plan

Review Summary by Qodo

Add Makefile header comment

📦 Other

Walkthroughs

Description

• Added comment header to Makefile
• Minimal change to trigger integration tests

Diagram

flowchart LR
  A["Makefile"] -- "Add header comment" --> B["Updated Makefile"]

Loading

File Changes

1. Makefile Formatting +2/-0

Add Makefile header comment

• Added Makefile header comment at the top of the file
• Added blank line after header for formatting

Makefile

---

[qodo-code-review]

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0) 📐 Spec deviations (0)

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

ⓘ The new review experience is currently in Beta. Learn more

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 59013ea1-b43c-40c5-aa6b-1f2a0855b172

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8332d47 and 90c5d23.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• Makefile

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A comment identifying the file as a Makefile is added to the beginning of the file. No functional changes, variables, or build targets are modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Makefile	Adds a # Makefile comment at the start of the file for clarity; no functional changes to build logic or variables.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'dnm test only!' is vague and uses a non-descriptive abbreviation ('dnm') that doesn't convey meaningful information about the changeset.	Replace the vague title with a descriptive summary of the actual change, e.g., 'Add Makefile header comment' or clarify what 'dnm' means.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description check	✅ Passed	The description is related to the changeset's intent (triggering tests via a code change) but doesn't actually describe what was changed in the Makefile.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Flag	Coverage Δ
acceptance	55.17% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
generative	17.90% <ø> (ø)
integration	26.63% <ø> (ø)
unit	69.01% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.